An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735 (1996), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a regulation of the Comptroller of Currency which included credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest and thus prevented individual states from limiting them when charged by nationally-chartered banks. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the regulation was reasonable enough under the Court's own Chevron standard for the justices to defer to the Comptroller.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735 (1996), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a regulation of the Comptroller of Currency which included credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest and thus prevented individual states from limiting them when charged by nationally-chartered banks. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the regulation was reasonable enough under the Court's own Chevron standard for the justices to defer to the Comptroller. The decision, which had begun as a class action in California, was seen as a victory for banks and credit-card issuers, who could mostly charge late fees as they pleased. For that same reason consumer advocates were displeased, warning that late fees could rise to previously unseen levels. They did, and one of the Citibank attorneys has expressed regret for his involvement. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19099987 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 15840 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1026179181 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1996 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Smiley v. Citibank, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1996 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Barbara Smiley v. Citibank , N. A. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Comptroller of Currency regulation including credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest was reasonable enough that Court defers to its expertise, thus individual states cannot limit them when charged by nationally-chartered banks (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Smiley v. Citibank (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 735 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 517 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735 (1996), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a regulation of the Comptroller of Currency which included credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest and thus prevented individual states from limiting them when charged by nationally-chartered banks. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the regulation was reasonable enough under the Court's own Chevron standard for the justices to defer to the Comptroller. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License