An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, holding (7–2, per Justice Brewer) that a suit for patent infringement cannot be entertained against the United States, because patent infringement is a tort and the United States has not waived sovereign immunity for intentional torts.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, holding (7–2, per Justice Brewer) that a suit for patent infringement cannot be entertained against the United States, because patent infringement is a tort and the United States has not waived sovereign immunity for intentional torts. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 21083462 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8024 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1018431155 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-10-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 10 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1894 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Schillinger v. United States, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1894 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The government of the United States may not be sued in Federal Court without its consent (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Shiras (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Field, Gray, Brown, Jackson, White, Fuller (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Brewer (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 15 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • 24 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 163 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 155 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, holding (7–2, per Justice Brewer) that a suit for patent infringement cannot be entertained against the United States, because patent infringement is a tort and the United States has not waived sovereign immunity for intentional torts. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Schillinger v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License