| dbo:abstract
|
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 548 U.S. 331 (2006), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state court did not have to exclude evidence that was admitted into court in violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4031 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 548 U.S. 331 (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Moises Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- States could admit evidence against defendants even if the evidence was obtained in violation of the Vienna Convention. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- Stevens, Souter; Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 548 U.S. 331 (2006), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state court did not have to exclude evidence that was admitted into court in violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Moises Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
