About: S v Dlamini (2012)

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

S v Dlamini was a South African court case. The central question was of duplication of convictions. The accused had been charged with and convicted on three counts of robbery. He was one of three perpetrators, one of whom was armed and had threatened a group of three women. The robbers had taken the women's property and departed. A 3-2 majority of the SCA found that there had been a separate intent by the robbers to rob each woman. There had, therefore, been no inappropriate duplication of convictions.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	S v Dlamini was a South African court case. The central question was of duplication of convictions. The accused had been charged with and convicted on three counts of robbery. He was one of three perpetrators, one of whom was armed and had threatened a group of three women. The robbers had taken the women's property and departed. A 3-2 majority of the SCA found that there had been a separate intent by the robbers to rob each woman. There had, therefore, been no inappropriate duplication of convictions. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	40388941 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4733 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1113306192 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:All_South_African_Law_Reports dbc:2012_in_case_law dbc:2012_in_South_African_law dbc:March_2012_events_in_South_Africa dbr:Gun dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Appeal_(South_Africa) dbr:Butterworths_Constitutional_Law_Reports dbr:South_Africa dbr:Intention_(criminal_law) dbr:KwaZulu-Natal_Division dbc:South_African_criminal_case_law dbr:Robbery dbr:S_v_Moloto dbr:Concurrent_sentence dbr:Firearms_regulation_in_South_Africa dbr:Motor_vehicle_theft dbr:South_African_Criminal_Law_Reports
dbp:appealedFrom	dbr:KwaZulu-Natal_Division
dbp:court	dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Appeal_(South_Africa)
dbp:dateDecided	2012-03-27 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy	Majiedt JA (en)
dbp:fullName	S v Dlamini (en)
dbp:italicTitle	force (en)
dbp:judges	Farlam JA, Van Heerden JA, Cachalia JA, Snyders JA, Majiedt JA (en)
dbp:name	S v Dlamini (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges	5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist dbt:Start_date dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2012_in_case_law dbc:2012_in_South_African_law dbc:March_2012_events_in_South_Africa dbc:South_African_criminal_case_law
gold:hypernym	dbr:Case
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	S v Dlamini was a South African court case. The central question was of duplication of convictions. The accused had been charged with and convicted on three counts of robbery. He was one of three perpetrators, one of whom was armed and had threatened a group of three women. The robbers had taken the women's property and departed. A 3-2 majority of the SCA found that there had been a separate intent by the robbers to rob each woman. There had, therefore, been no inappropriate duplication of convictions. (en)
rdfs:label	S v Dlamini (2012) (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:S v Dlamini (2012) wikidata:S v Dlamini (2012) https://global.dbpedia.org/id/fPKA
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:S_v_Dlamini_(2012)?oldid=1113306192&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:S_v_Dlamini_(2012)
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:S_v_Dlamini_(2012)