| dbo:abstract
|
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case which analyzed whether police officers may extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a search with a trained detection dog. In a 6–3 opinion, the Court held that officers may not extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff unrelated to the original purpose of the stop. However, the Court remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to determine whether the officer's extension of the traffic stop was independently justified by reasonable suspicion. Some analysts have suggested that the Court's decision to limit police authority was influenced by ongoing protests in Ferguson, Missouri. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 18486 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:align
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Rodriguez v. United States, (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Thomas (en)
- Kennedy (en)
- Alito (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Dennys Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Absent reasonable suspicion, officers may not extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Rodriguez v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:quote
|
- Have you ever accidentally knocked something over and then embarrassedly just walked away rather than helping to clean it up, hoping that no one noticed? Sometimes the Supreme Court corrects its own mistakes this way – not overruling, but just quietly and slowly walking away, over years and various decisions, from a rationale that increasingly seems mistaken. (en)
|
| dbp:source
|
- —Rory Little, Professor of Law, suggesting that the Court attempted to distance itself from prior rulings (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:width
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case which analyzed whether police officers may extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a search with a trained detection dog. In a 6–3 opinion, the Court held that officers may not extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff unrelated to the original purpose of the stop. However, the Court remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to determine whether the officer's extension of the traffic stop was independently justified by reasonable suspicion. Some analysts have suggested that the Court's decision to limit police authority was influenced by ongoing protests in Ferguson, Missouri. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Rodriguez v. United States (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Dennys Rodriguez, Petitioner v.United States (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
