| dbo:abstract
|
- Redfern v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd, was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power in section 51(i) of the Constitution. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 5084 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies, Windeyer and Owen JJ (en)
|
| dbp:name
|
- Redfern v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd (en)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- Section 4 of the Australian Industries Preservation Act applied to a contract in the restraint of trade which dealt with intrastate and interstate trade. (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Redfern v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd, was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power in section 51(i) of the Constitution. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Redfern v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
