About: Re Davis

An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In Re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409; [1947] HCA 53 is a High Court of Australia case regarding the admission of legal practitioners and the jurisdiction of courts over barristers.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In Re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409; [1947] HCA 53 is a High Court of Australia case regarding the admission of legal practitioners and the jurisdiction of courts over barristers. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 7733377 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2229 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1030386300 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1947-12-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullName
  • In Re Davis (en)
dbp:judges
  • Latham CJ, Starke, Dixon, McTiernan and Williams JJ (en)
dbp:name
  • In Re Davis (en)
dbp:opinions
  • ' The Supreme Court of New South Wales is not bound by section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act 1898-1936 to admit to the bar a candidate who is approved by the Board. ' The power of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to disbar may be exercised upon a ground that is antecedent to the admission of a barrister or the determination of the Board to approve him as a fit and proper person. The Supreme Court rightly held that the appellant was not a fit and proper person to be a barrister. (en)
dbp:priorActions
  • In Re Davis 48 SR 33 (en)
dbp:subsequentActions
  • none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In Re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409; [1947] HCA 53 is a High Court of Australia case regarding the admission of legal practitioners and the jurisdiction of courts over barristers. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Re Davis (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License