An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Adams [1957] is an English case that established the principle of double effect applicable to doctors: that if a doctor "gave treatment to a seriously ill patient with the aim of relieving pain or distress, as a result of which that person's life was inadvertently shortened, the doctor was not guilty of murder" where a restoration to health is no longer possible. Such medicines are among those sometimes used in palliative care (the branch of medicine focussed on the relief of pain), most commonly for the most severe pain.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R v Adams [1957] is an English case that established the principle of double effect applicable to doctors: that if a doctor "gave treatment to a seriously ill patient with the aim of relieving pain or distress, as a result of which that person's life was inadvertently shortened, the doctor was not guilty of murder" where a restoration to health is no longer possible. Such medicines are among those sometimes used in palliative care (the branch of medicine focussed on the relief of pain), most commonly for the most severe pain. The case narrowly distinguished and approved the binding precedent R v Dyson which confirms it is no defence, in itself, in offences of homicide, that the victim was already dying from an illness if the defendant's conduct has accelerated death. Doctors have an absolute defence to this where they have "properly" eased the suffering of the patient. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5877622 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9408 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1082980514 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caption
  • Morphine, as in the case, is often prescribed in a relatively high dose to those in most severe, chronic pain, and high doses and cumulation of such opioids accelerates dying (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1957] Crim LR 365 (en)
dbp:court
  • Crown Court (en)
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1957-04-08 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Jury (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Regina v. John Bodkin Adams (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:keywords
  • palliative care, principle of double effect as to care by doctors, ease of suffering, murder, euthanasia (en)
dbp:name
  • R v John Bodkin Adams (en)
dbp:priorActions
  • none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R v Adams [1957] is an English case that established the principle of double effect applicable to doctors: that if a doctor "gave treatment to a seriously ill patient with the aim of relieving pain or distress, as a result of which that person's life was inadvertently shortened, the doctor was not guilty of murder" where a restoration to health is no longer possible. Such medicines are among those sometimes used in palliative care (the branch of medicine focussed on the relief of pain), most commonly for the most severe pain. (en)
rdfs:label
  • R v Adams (1957) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License