About: R v Parks

An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence. On an early morning on May 24, 1987, Kenneth Parks drove 20 kilometres from Pickering, Ontario to the house of his in-laws in Scarborough, Ontario. He entered their house with a key they had previously given him and used a tire iron to bludgeon his mother-in-law to death. He then turned on his father-in-law, attempting unsuccessfully to choke him to death. Parks got back in his car and, despite being covered with blood, drove straight to a nearby police station and confessed, turning himself in, stating "I think I have just killed two people".

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence. On an early morning on May 24, 1987, Kenneth Parks drove 20 kilometres from Pickering, Ontario to the house of his in-laws in Scarborough, Ontario. He entered their house with a key they had previously given him and used a tire iron to bludgeon his mother-in-law to death. He then turned on his father-in-law, attempting unsuccessfully to choke him to death. Parks got back in his car and, despite being covered with blood, drove straight to a nearby police station and confessed, turning himself in, stating "I think I have just killed two people". At trial, Parks argued that he was automatistic and not criminally liable. In his defence, a doctor testified as to his mental state at the time of the murder. From the doctor's evidence, it was determined that the accused was sleepwalking at the time of the incident, and that he was suffering from a disorder of sleep rather than neurological, psychiatric, or other illness. Five neurological experts also confirmed that he was sleepwalking during the time of the incident. The jury acquitted Parks. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the condition of sleepwalking can be classified as non-insane automatism or should it be classified as "disease of the mind" (i.e. mental disorder automatism) and warrant a verdict of not guilty for reason of insanity. This distinction is a matter of law and decided by the judge. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 3804697 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4182 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1110879149 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R v Parks (en)
dbp:chiefJustice
dbp:citations
  • [1992] 2 S.C.R. 87 (en)
dbp:docket
  • 22073 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Her Majesty The Queen v Kenneth James Parks (en)
dbp:priorHistory
  • Court of Appeal for Ontario (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal Dismissed (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence. On an early morning on May 24, 1987, Kenneth Parks drove 20 kilometres from Pickering, Ontario to the house of his in-laws in Scarborough, Ontario. He entered their house with a key they had previously given him and used a tire iron to bludgeon his mother-in-law to death. He then turned on his father-in-law, attempting unsuccessfully to choke him to death. Parks got back in his car and, despite being covered with blood, drove straight to a nearby police station and confessed, turning himself in, stating "I think I have just killed two people". (en)
rdfs:label
  • R v Parks (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License