dbo:abstract
|
- Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that certain interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
- 프린츠 대 미국 사건(Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997))은 연방법인 브래들리법이 요구되는 소총소지허가 지원자의 신분조사를 위해 주소속 지역경찰관을 동원하는 것은 연방의회는 주행정부로 하여금 그 기능을 수행하도록 강요할 수 없어 위헌이라고 선언하였다. (ko)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 19248 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-12-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Printz v. United States, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
|
- Thomas (en)
- O'Connor (en)
|
dbp:date
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Souter (en)
- Stevens (en)
- Breyer (en)
|
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, Petitioner 95-1478 v. United States; Richard Mack, Petitioner 95-1503 v. United States (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act's interim provision commanding the "chief law enforcement officer" of each local jurisdiction to conduct background checks, §922, is unconstitutional. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
|
- Stevens (en)
- Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. amend. X; Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub. L. 103-159, 107 Stat. 1536 (en)
|
dbp:litigants
|
- Printz v. United States (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:reason
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that certain interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
- 프린츠 대 미국 사건(Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997))은 연방법인 브래들리법이 요구되는 소총소지허가 지원자의 신분조사를 위해 주소속 지역경찰관을 동원하는 것은 연방의회는 주행정부로 하여금 그 기능을 수행하도록 강요할 수 없어 위헌이라고 선언하였다. (ko)
|
rdfs:label
|
- 프린츠 대 미국 사건 (ko)
- Printz v. United States (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, Petitioner 95-1478 v. United States; Richard Mack, Petitioner 95-1503 v. United States (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |