| dbo:abstract
|
- Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (also known as 'Anshun') is a decision of the High Court of Australia. The case is notable for originating the 'Anshun estoppel' doctrine in Australian civil proceedings. The rule estops parties from making novel legal claims, when those claims should have been pursued in an earlier legal proceeding. Anshun is the 29th most cited High Court case as of January 2021. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 9596 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- Gibbs CJ, Mason, Murphy, Aickin and Brennan JJ (en)
|
| dbp:name
|
- Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (en)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- majority (en)
- Brennan J (en)
- Murphy J (en)
- Gibbs CJ, Mason and Aickin JJ (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (also known as 'Anshun') is a decision of the High Court of Australia. The case is notable for originating the 'Anshun estoppel' doctrine in Australian civil proceedings. The rule estops parties from making novel legal claims, when those claims should have been pursued in an earlier legal proceeding. Anshun is the 29th most cited High Court case as of January 2021. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
