An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989).

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989). (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19428270 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 18574 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1112179735 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Payne v. Tennessee, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Souter (en)
  • O'Connor (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stevens (en)
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The admission of a victim impact statement does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Kennedy (en)
  • O'Connor, Kennedy (en)
  • White, Kennedy (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Payne v. Tennessee (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
  • South Carolina v. Gathers (en)
  • Booth v. Maryland (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 808 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 501 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989). (en)
rdfs:label
  • Payne v. Tennessee (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License