| dbo:description
|
- Irish Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:appealedTo
| |
| dbp:caption
| |
| dbp:citations
|
- [2016] IESC 18; [2016] 2 IR 585 (en)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decisionBy
| |
| dbp:fullName
|
- Nowak v The Data Protection Commissioner (en)
|
| dbp:italicTitle
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- O'Donnell Donal J, McKechnie J, Clarke J, MacMenamin J, Laffoy J, Dunne J, Charleton J (en)
|
| dbp:keywords
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Nowak v The Data Protection Commissioner (en)
|
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:opinions
|
- Upon referreal by the Supreme Court, the CJEU decided that the answers provided by a candidate sitting an exam can be considered as information relating to the candidate and thus can be defined as the personal data of the candidate. (en)
|
| dbp:transcripts
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner (en)
|
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |