An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. Definitions may fail to have merit, because they: are overly broad, use obscure or ambiguous language, or contain circular reasoning; those are called fallacies of definition. Three major fallacies are: overly broad, overly narrow, and mutually exclusive definitions, a fourth is: incomprehensible definitions, and one of the most common is circular definitions.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Las definiciones pueden ser erróneas de varias formas. Por conveniencia nos podemos referir a ellas como falacias de definición (por analogía con falacia lógica). (es)
  • Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. Definitions may fail to have merit, because they: are overly broad, use obscure or ambiguous language, or contain circular reasoning; those are called fallacies of definition. Three major fallacies are: overly broad, overly narrow, and mutually exclusive definitions, a fourth is: incomprehensible definitions, and one of the most common is circular definitions. (en)
  • 定義謬誤是泛指一系列因定義不當造成的推理問題。 (zh)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10632 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6822 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1122837540 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:date
  • October 2017 (en)
dbp:reason
  • Does not explain anything (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Las definiciones pueden ser erróneas de varias formas. Por conveniencia nos podemos referir a ellas como falacias de definición (por analogía con falacia lógica). (es)
  • Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. Definitions may fail to have merit, because they: are overly broad, use obscure or ambiguous language, or contain circular reasoning; those are called fallacies of definition. Three major fallacies are: overly broad, overly narrow, and mutually exclusive definitions, a fourth is: incomprehensible definitions, and one of the most common is circular definitions. (en)
  • 定義謬誤是泛指一系列因定義不當造成的推理問題。 (zh)
rdfs:label
  • Falacias de definición (es)
  • Fallacies of definition (en)
  • 定義謬誤 (zh)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License