An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), is a criminal case in which a unanimous court struck down a state statute requiring a defendant to prove the defense of provocation to downgrade a murder conviction to manslaughter. Previous common law, such as in Commonwealth v. York (1845), allowed such burden on the defense. States were able to circumvent this decision by careful wording, as in Patterson v. New York, in which provocation, or "extreme emotional disturbance", was classified as an allowable defense excuse, not as a listed element.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), is a criminal case in which a unanimous court struck down a state statute requiring a defendant to prove the defense of provocation to downgrade a murder conviction to manslaughter. Previous common law, such as in Commonwealth v. York (1845), allowed such burden on the defense. Maine's statute defined murder as unlawfully killing with malice, with malice defined as deliberate and unprovoked cruelty, and added that killings were presumed to be unprovoked unless the defense proved provocation by a preponderance of the evidence. Justice Powell delivered the opinion for the court that provocation was a crucial part of the charge in that it determined "the degree of culpability attaching to the criminal homicide". States were able to circumvent this decision by careful wording, as in Patterson v. New York, in which provocation, or "extreme emotional disturbance", was classified as an allowable defense excuse, not as a listed element. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 52016457 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3214 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 942080697 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1975 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1975 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur (en)
dbp:holding
  • The Maine rule does not comport with the requirement of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Burger (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Powell (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 684 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 421 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975), is a criminal case in which a unanimous court struck down a state statute requiring a defendant to prove the defense of provocation to downgrade a murder conviction to manslaughter. Previous common law, such as in Commonwealth v. York (1845), allowed such burden on the defense. States were able to circumvent this decision by careful wording, as in Patterson v. New York, in which provocation, or "extreme emotional disturbance", was classified as an allowable defense excuse, not as a listed element. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License