An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use at or across the street from a school-supervised event.In 2002, Juneau-Douglas High School principal Deborah Morse suspended Joseph Frederick after he displayed a banner reading "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" [sic] across the street from the school during the 2002 Winter Olympics torch relay. Frederick sued, claiming his constitutional rights to free speech were violated. His suit was dismissed by the federal district court, but on appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the ruling, concluding that Frederick's speech rights were violated. The case then went on to

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use at or across the street from a school-supervised event.In 2002, Juneau-Douglas High School principal Deborah Morse suspended Joseph Frederick after he displayed a banner reading "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" [sic] across the street from the school during the 2002 Winter Olympics torch relay. Frederick sued, claiming his constitutional rights to free speech were violated. His suit was dismissed by the federal district court, but on appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the ruling, concluding that Frederick's speech rights were violated. The case then went on to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, concluded that the school officials did not violate the First Amendment. To do so, he made three legal determinations: first, that "school speech" doctrine should apply because Frederick's speech occurred "at a school event"; second, that the speech was "reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use"; and third, that a principal may legally restrict that speech—based on the three existing First Amendment school speech precedents, other Constitutional jurisprudence relating to schools and a school's "important, indeed, perhaps compelling interest" in deterring drug use by students. One scholar noted that "by its plain language, Morse's holding is narrow in that it expressly applies only to student speech promoting illegal drug use." She adds, however, that courts could nonetheless apply it to other student speech that, like speech encouraging illegal drug use, similarly undermines schools' educational missions or threatens students' safety. "Further, Morse arguably permits viewpoint discrimination of purely political speech whenever that speech mentions illegal drugs—a result seemingly at odds with the First Amendment." (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 6512658 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 59699 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1105843450 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2007 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Morse v. Frederick, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
  • Alito (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2007 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:docket
  • 6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Deborah Morse and the Juneau School Board, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph Frederick (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Because schools may take steps to safeguard those entrusted to their care from speech that can be regarded as encouraging illegal drug use, the school officials in this case did not violate the First Amendment by confiscating the pro-drug banner and suspending Frederick. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Kennedy (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Souter, Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV; (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Morse v. Frederick (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 393 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 551 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
georss:point
  • 58.3057 -134.4291
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use at or across the street from a school-supervised event.In 2002, Juneau-Douglas High School principal Deborah Morse suspended Joseph Frederick after he displayed a banner reading "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" [sic] across the street from the school during the 2002 Winter Olympics torch relay. Frederick sued, claiming his constitutional rights to free speech were violated. His suit was dismissed by the federal district court, but on appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the ruling, concluding that Frederick's speech rights were violated. The case then went on to (en)
rdfs:label
  • Morse v. Frederick (en)
owl:sameAs
geo:geometry
  • POINT(-134.42909240723 58.305698394775)
geo:lat
  • 58.305698 (xsd:float)
geo:long
  • -134.429092 (xsd:float)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Deborah Morse and the Juneau School Board, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph Frederick (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License