An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 4179898 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6067 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1069233010 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R. V Morgentaler (en)
dbp:chiefJustice
  • Laskin CJC (en)
dbp:citations
  • Morgentaler v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 616 (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Pigeon J (en)
  • Dickson J (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Laskin CJC (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1975-03-26 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Dr. Henry Morgentaler v Her Majesty The Queen and Attorney General of Canada, Foundation for Women in Crisis, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Alliance for Life, Association des médecins du Québec and the Front Commun pour le Respect de la vie, and Fondation pour la vie (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 0001-10-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:history
  • APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec: R v Morgentaler, [1974] CA 129 . (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Judson and Spence JJ (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Martland, Ritchie, Beetz and de Grandpré JJ (en)
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Criminal Code, RSC 1970, c C-34, ss 45, 251, , 613, 603, 605, 618 (en)
dbp:majority
  • Pigeon J (en)
  • Dickson J (en)
dbp:puisneJustices
  • Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz and de Grandpré JJ (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Section 251 of the Criminal Code which prohibits abortion except under certain circumstances is a valid exercise of the federal criminal law power and does not infringe the Canadian Bill of Rights. The indictment was not an abuse of process. The defence of necessity did not apply, nor did the defence set out in s 45 of the Criminal Code relating to medical procedures. The Court of Appeal had the power to set aside the acquittal and enter a conviction, but this power is to be used with great circumspection. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Morgentaler v R (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License