McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that Kansas' (SATP) served a vital penological purpose and determined that allowing minimal incentives to take part in the SATP does not equal compelled self-incrimination as prohibited by the Fifth Amendment. There were three main points to the case that were used to determine the SATPs were constitutional as summarized by the National District Attorneys Association (NDAA). These included the distinct findings that, “[t]he SATP in Kansas is supported by the legitimate penological objective of rehabilitation”, that, “the fact that Kansas does not offer immunity or privilege in response to statements made by participants does not render the SATP invalid under the [fifth] amendment”, and
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract |
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
|
dbo:wikiPageID |
|
dbo:wikiPageLength |
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
|
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
|
dbp:arguedate |
|
dbp:argueyear |
|
dbp:case |
|
dbp:concurrence |
|
dbp:cornell | |
dbp:courtlistener | |
dbp:decidedate |
|
dbp:decideyear |
|
dbp:dissent |
|
dbp:fullname |
|
dbp:googlescholar | |
dbp:holding |
|
dbp:joindissent |
|
dbp:joinplurality |
|
dbp:justia | |
dbp:litigants |
|
dbp:loc | |
dbp:oyez | |
dbp:parallelcitations |
|
dbp:plurality |
|
dbp:prior |
|
dbp:uspage |
|
dbp:usvol |
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
dcterms:subject | |
rdf:type |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
rdfs:label |
|
owl:sameAs | |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
foaf:name |
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |