| dbo:abstract
|
- Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10739 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-05-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth (en)
|
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:opinions
|
- Aboriginal Australians are not within the reach of the "aliens" power conferred by s 51 of the Constitution. Mr Thoms is an Aboriginal Australian and is not an alien under section 51 of the Australian Constitution. (en)
- Aboriginal Australians are not within the reach of the "aliens" power conferred by s 51 of the Constitution). The Court is unable, however, to agree as to whether Mr Love is an Aboriginal Australian and unable to determine whether Mr Love is an "alien" under section 51 of the Australian Constitution. (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
