An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Lewis v. Clarke, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 8–0 that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in a suit against a tribal employee in his individual capacity, and an indemnification provision cannot extend tribal sovereign immunity to cases in which it would otherwise not apply. Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg each wrote concurring opinions that both said that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in suits arising from commercial activity off of tribal territory. Justice Neil Gorsuch was not involved in the discussion or decision of this case.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Lewis v. Clarke, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 8–0 that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in a suit against a tribal employee in his individual capacity, and an indemnification provision cannot extend tribal sovereign immunity to cases in which it would otherwise not apply. Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg each wrote concurring opinions that both said that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in suits arising from commercial activity off of tribal territory. Justice Neil Gorsuch was not involved in the discussion or decision of this case. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 53957709 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2628 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088222881 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2017 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Lewis v. Clarke, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2017 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 15 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Brian Lewis, et al., Petitioners v. William Clarke (en)
dbp:holding
  • Tribal sovereign immunity does not extend to suits against a tribal employee acting in his individual capacity. Supreme Court of Connecticut reversed and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Kagan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Lewis v. Clarke (en)
dbp:majority
  • Sotomayor (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Gorsuch (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 581 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Lewis v. Clarke, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 8–0 that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in a suit against a tribal employee in his individual capacity, and an indemnification provision cannot extend tribal sovereign immunity to cases in which it would otherwise not apply. Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg each wrote concurring opinions that both said that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in suits arising from commercial activity off of tribal territory. Justice Neil Gorsuch was not involved in the discussion or decision of this case. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Lewis v. Clarke (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Brian Lewis, et al., Petitioners v. William Clarke (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License