| dbo:abstract
|
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case that applied the Daubert standard to expert testimony from non-scientists. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 8967 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-12-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael et al. (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- In a trial in a U.S. federal court, the Daubert Standard governs the admission of expert testimony from non-scientists as well. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- Daubert Standard, Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case that applied the Daubert standard to expert testimony from non-scientists. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
