| dbo:abstract
|
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a party, particularly a corporation, may be subject to the jurisdiction of a state court if it has "minimum contacts" with that state. The ruling has important consequences for corporations involved in interstate commerce, their payments to state unemployment compensation funds, limits on the power of states imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the sufficiency of service of process, and, especially, personal jurisdiction. (en)
- 인터내셔널 슈 대 워싱턴 판결(International Shoe Co. v. Washington), 326 U.S. 310 (1945)은 미국 연방 대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미국 민사소송법에서 주간 관할권을 확립한 사건으로 유명하다. (ko)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10985 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- International Shoe v. Washington, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-12-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, Office of Unemployment Compensation & Placement, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Suit cannot be brought against an individual unless they have minimum contacts with the forum state, and such lawsuit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge, Burton (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. Amendment XIV; 26 U.S.C. § 1606; Washington Unemployment Compensation Act (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- Special appearance by appellant in Washington state court as defendant in lower court; appellant moved to set aside order on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction; tribunal denied motion; state Superior Court affirmed; state Supreme Court affirmed (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a party, particularly a corporation, may be subject to the jurisdiction of a state court if it has "minimum contacts" with that state. The ruling has important consequences for corporations involved in interstate commerce, their payments to state unemployment compensation funds, limits on the power of states imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the sufficiency of service of process, and, especially, personal jurisdiction. (en)
- 인터내셔널 슈 대 워싱턴 판결(International Shoe Co. v. Washington), 326 U.S. 310 (1945)은 미국 연방 대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미국 민사소송법에서 주간 관할권을 확립한 사건으로 유명하다. (ko)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington (en)
- 인터내셔널 슈 대 워싱턴 사건 (ko)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, Office of Unemployment Compensation & Placement, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
