About: In re Gault

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which held the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which held the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 7087464 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 10790 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1112839305 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • December 44 dic re coc (en)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1966 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • In re Gault, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Black (en)
  • White (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1967 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stewart (en)
dbp:fullname
  • In re Gault et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings should have the right of due process protected by the 5th Amendment, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Warren, Douglas, Clark, Brennan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • In re Gault (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Fortas (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from the Supreme Court of Arizona (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 387 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which held the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights. (en)
rdfs:label
  • In re Gault (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • In reGault et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License