About: Hadiya case

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

The Hadiya case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M) was a 2017–2018 Indian Supreme Court case that affirmed the validity of the marriage of Hadiya (formerly Akhila Ashokan) and Shafin Jehan, which was challenged by Hadiya's family. Media outlets have described the underlying dispute as an allegation of "love jihad".

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • The Hadiya case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M) was a 2017–2018 Indian Supreme Court case that affirmed the validity of the marriage of Hadiya (formerly Akhila Ashokan) and Shafin Jehan, which was challenged by Hadiya's family. Media outlets have described the underlying dispute as an allegation of "love jihad". At the time of the case, Hadiya was a homeopathic medical student from Vaikom, Kerala. In early 2016, she was reported missing by her father, Asokan K.M, who filed a police case followed by a habeas corpus petition in the Kerala High Court to trace her; Hadiya has described the circumstances of her leaving as her father forbidding her from practicing Islam. She left her home for college on 6 January, dressed in a hijab. Hadiya was staying with A.S. Zainaba, president of Popular Front of India (PFI)'s women's wing, the National Women's Front (NWF). She had converted to Islam and married Jehan, a Muslim man. Jehan was an active member of the PFI-affiliated Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI). Her family alleged that she was brainwashed and that her marriage was forced, but Hadiya said she married of her own volition. In May 2017, Hadiya's marriage was annulled by the High Court of Kerala on the grounds that Hadiya was a victim of indoctrination and psychological kidnapping, and that their claims of their marriage being arranged through a matrimony website were "bogus". The High Court of Kerala then handed over Hadiya's custody to her father, Ashokan, arguing that "As per Indian tradition, the custody of an unmarried daughter is with the parents, until she is properly married." Jahan appealed the Kerala High Court order, and moved to the Supreme Court. In November 2017, the Supreme Court of India directed Hadiya to resume her internship, and that she was free to meet whomever she wanted. In March 2018, the Supreme Court restored Hadiya's marriage, 10 months after the Kerala High Court annulled it. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 55910698 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 34711 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1115824945 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
dbp:appealedTo
dbp:court
dbp:fullName
  • Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M & ORS (en)
dbp:italicTitle
  • no (en)
dbp:judges
  • Justice Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar (en)
  • Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (en)
  • Justice Dipak Misra (en)
dbp:name
  • Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:opinions
  • Hadiya was allowed to re-join her medical college to continue her studies and her marriage with Shafin Jahan was restored. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • The Hadiya case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M) was a 2017–2018 Indian Supreme Court case that affirmed the validity of the marriage of Hadiya (formerly Akhila Ashokan) and Shafin Jehan, which was challenged by Hadiya's family. Media outlets have described the underlying dispute as an allegation of "love jihad". (en)
rdfs:label
  • Hadiya case (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License