| dbo:abstract
|
- Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir., 2010), is a case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have ancillary jurisdiction over the content delivery choices of Internet service providers, under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. In so holding, the Court vacated a 2008 order issued by the FCC that asserted jurisdiction over network management policies and censured Comcast from interfering with its subscribers' use of peer-to-peer software. The case has been regarded as an important precedent on whether the FCC can regulate network neutrality. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12882 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:courtseal
|
- Seal of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.png (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Comcast Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- The FCC does not have ancillary jurisdiction over Comcast's Internet service under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Chief Judge Sentelle and Judge Randolph (en)
|
| dbp:judges
|
- Chief Judge David B. Sentelle; Circuit Judges Arthur Raymond Randolph and David S. Tatel (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Comcast Corp. v. FCC (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir., 2010), is a case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have ancillary jurisdiction over the content delivery choices of Internet service providers, under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. In so holding, the Court vacated a 2008 order issued by the FCC that asserted jurisdiction over network management policies and censured Comcast from interfering with its subscribers' use of peer-to-peer software. The case has been regarded as an important precedent on whether the FCC can regulate network neutrality. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Comcast Corp. v. FCC (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
