An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99, is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which it was held that the Minister for Finance did not breach his power in issuing promissory notes (promises to pay money at a later date) under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, which was found to be constitutional. Collins' appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, which concluded that, “a Minister for Finance can spend any amount of money they deem necessary in an emergency without going back to the Dáil and we will be challenging that in the Dáil itself.” The case thus legalised emergency measure to deal with Ireland's financial crisis. This was a case in which "the matters described" were of "national importance."

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99, is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which it was held that the Minister for Finance did not breach his power in issuing promissory notes (promises to pay money at a later date) under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, which was found to be constitutional. Collins' appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, which concluded that, “a Minister for Finance can spend any amount of money they deem necessary in an emergency without going back to the Dáil and we will be challenging that in the Dáil itself.” The case thus legalised emergency measure to deal with Ireland's financial crisis. This was a case in which "the matters described" were of "national importance." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 61959717 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9790 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1100731081 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
  • High Court (en)
dbp:appealedTo
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:caption
dbp:citations
  • Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99 (en)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 0001-12-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:italicTitle
  • yes (en)
dbp:judges
  • Denham C.J.,O’Donnell J.,McKechnie J.,Clarke J, Dunne J., Charleton J. (en)
dbp:keywords
  • Constitution of Ireland State Finance, Locus Standi, Ministerial Power (en)
dbp:name
  • Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99 (en)
dbp:opinions
  • The Appeal of Joan Collins, TD to the legality of the Minister for Finance giving promissory notes to financial institutions (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99, is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which it was held that the Minister for Finance did not breach his power in issuing promissory notes (promises to pay money at a later date) under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, which was found to be constitutional. Collins' appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, which concluded that, “a Minister for Finance can spend any amount of money they deem necessary in an emergency without going back to the Dáil and we will be challenging that in the Dáil itself.” The case thus legalised emergency measure to deal with Ireland's financial crisis. This was a case in which "the matters described" were of "national importance." (en)
rdfs:label
  • Collins v Minister for Finance (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License