dbo:abstract
|
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61 (1996), held that federal jurisdiction predicated on diversity of citizenship can be sustained even if there did not exist complete diversity at the time of removal to federal court, so long as complete diversity exists at the time the district court enters judgment. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 8731 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, (en)
|
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-12-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. James David Lewis (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- If a case is improperly removed to federal court purportedly under diversity of citizenship, and the district court fails to remand the case back to state court, it does not lack jurisdiction to try the case if, at the time judgment is entered, complete diversity exists between the parties. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
| |
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. art. III; ; (en)
|
dbp:litigants
|
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61 (1996), held that federal jurisdiction predicated on diversity of citizenship can be sustained even if there did not exist complete diversity at the time of removal to federal court, so long as complete diversity exists at the time the district court enters judgment. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. James David Lewis (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |