An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 28129368 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7051 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1082968940 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 35 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
  • Court of Chancery (en)
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1812-12-24 (xsd:date)
dbp:judges
  • Lord Eldon LC, Sir Samuel Romilly (en)
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Carlen v Drury (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Carlen v Drury (1812) 35 ER 61 is a UK partnership law case, which is often cited for a broader principle in UK company law that the court generally does not allow litigation by members where a procedure for redress is set out in the articles of association. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Carlen v Drury (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License