| dbo:abstract
|
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the "fraud-on-the-market theory" as giving rise to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 9519 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Basic Incorporated, et al., Petitioners v. Max L. Levinson et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Plaintiffs are entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in a 10b-5 case, based on a fraud-on-the-market theory. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Brennan, Marshall, Stevens; White, O'Connor (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
|
- Rehnquist, Scalia, and Kennedy (en)
|
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the "fraud-on-the-market theory" as giving rise to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Basic Incorporated, et al., Petitioners v. Max L. Levinson et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
