| dbo:abstract
|
- Barton v Armstrong is a Privy Council decision heard on appeal from the Court of Appeal of New South Wales, relating to duress and pertinent to case law under Australian and English contract law. The Privy Council held that a person who agrees to a contract under physical duress may avoid the contract, even if the duress was not the main reason for agreeing to the bargain. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 5476 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decisionBy
|
- Lord Cross of Chelsea, Lord Kilbrandon and Sir Garfield Barwick (en)
|
| dbp:fullName
|
- Alexander Barton, Appellant v. Alexander Ewan Armstrong and Others, Respondents (en)
|
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:keywords
| |
| dbp:name
| |
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Barton v Armstrong [1973] 2 NSWLR 598 (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Barton v Armstrong is a Privy Council decision heard on appeal from the Court of Appeal of New South Wales, relating to duress and pertinent to case law under Australian and English contract law. The Privy Council held that a person who agrees to a contract under physical duress may avoid the contract, even if the duress was not the main reason for agreeing to the bargain. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
