| dbo:abstract
|
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016). (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 15386 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:abrogated
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-01-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Anderson, et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included in the statutory workweek under Fair Labor Standards Act. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Black, Reed, Douglas, Rutledge (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
|
- Petition for rehearing denied, . (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016). (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Anderson, et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
