An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. was a case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding the copyrightability of digitized typefaces (computer fonts). The case is notable since typeface designs in general are not protected under United States copyright law, as determined in Eltra Corp. v. Ringer. Since that case, the United States Copyright Office has published policy decisions acknowledging the registration of computer programs that generate typefaces. In this case, the court held that Adobe's Utopia font was protectable under copyright and Southern Software, Inc.'s Veracity font was substantially similar and infringing.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. was a case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding the copyrightability of digitized typefaces (computer fonts). The case is notable since typeface designs in general are not protected under United States copyright law, as determined in Eltra Corp. v. Ringer. Since that case, the United States Copyright Office has published policy decisions acknowledging the registration of computer programs that generate typefaces. In this case, the court held that Adobe's Utopia font was protectable under copyright and Southern Software, Inc.'s Veracity font was substantially similar and infringing. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 29287604 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11385 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1094087470 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 172800.0
dbp:court
dbp:date
  • June 2022 (en)
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1998-01-30 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • No. C-95-20710 RMW (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. (en)
dbp:holding
  • The court held that Adobe's font program was protectable expression, and Southern Software's font was substantially similar and infringing. (en)
dbp:imagesize
  • 150 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judge
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. (en)
dbp:reason
  • Ex parte Tayama was rejected, so this can't be the case. Also Ex parte Tayama was about the design of an icon not a font. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. was a case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding the copyrightability of digitized typefaces (computer fonts). The case is notable since typeface designs in general are not protected under United States copyright law, as determined in Eltra Corp. v. Ringer. Since that case, the United States Copyright Office has published policy decisions acknowledging the registration of computer programs that generate typefaces. In this case, the court held that Adobe's Utopia font was protectable under copyright and Southern Software, Inc.'s Veracity font was substantially similar and infringing. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License