About: Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2001] IESC 38 is a reported decision of the Irish Supreme Court, in which the Court, in affirming High Court orders to strike out two judicial review proceedings as frivolous, held that, to challenge the decision of a public authority, one must attempt to rely on proved individual circumstances. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.esri.ie/system/files%3Ffile=media/file-uploads/2015-07/BKMNEXT077.pdf https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2001/38.html https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/compliance/C2014-113_Ireland/frPartyC113_10.06.2016/Annex_7_Adams_v_Minister_for_Justice__2001__3_IR_53.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	60228842 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	16809 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1037008686 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Romania dbr:Constitution_of_Ireland dbc:2001_in_Irish_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland_cases dbc:Judicial_review dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland dbr:Coat_of_arms_of_Ireland dbr:High_Court_(Ireland) dbr:Certiorari dbr:Mandamus dbr:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:High_Court_of_Ireland dbr:John_O'Donovan_(judge)
dbp:appealedFrom	High Court (en)
dbp:appealedTo	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:caption	dbr:Coat_of_arms_of_Ireland
dbp:citations	[2001] 3 IR 53;[2001] 2 ILRM 452; [2001] IESC 38 (en)
dbp:court	dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland
dbp:dateDecided	2001-04-05 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy	McGuinness J, Hardiman J (en)
dbp:fullName	Toma Adam and Ors. v The Minister for Justice Ireland and The Attorney General (en)
dbp:italicTitle	yes (en)
dbp:judges	Hardiman J, McGuinness J, Murray J (en)
dbp:keywords	Constitution of Ireland Constitution Personal Rights Appeal Judicial Review Asylum (en)
dbp:name	Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges	3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:opinions	To challenge the decision of a public authority in judicial review proceedings, one must attempt to rely on proved individual circumstances. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:! dbt:Morefootnotes dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2001_in_Irish_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland_cases dbc:Judicial_review
rdfs:comment	Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2001] IESC 38 is a reported decision of the Irish Supreme Court, in which the Court, in affirming High Court orders to strike out two judicial review proceedings as frivolous, held that, to challenge the decision of a public authority, one must attempt to rely on proved individual circumstances. (en)
rdfs:label	Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform https://global.dbpedia.org/id/CC3j5
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Adam_v_The_Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform?oldid=1037008686&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Adam_v_The_Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_Irish_Supreme_Court_cases
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Adam_v_The_Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform