dbo:abstract
|
- Ams v Minister for Justice and Equality, [2015] 1 ILRM 170; [2014] IESC 65, was a Irish Supreme Court case where the Court held that Section 18 (4) of allowed the Minister of Justice to assess the potential financial strain that a refugee's dependents would place on the State while deciding on an application for entry. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10401 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:appealedFrom
| |
dbp:appealedTo
| |
dbp:caption
| |
dbp:citations
|
- [2015] 1 ILRM 170; [2014] IESC 65 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:decisionBy
| |
dbp:italicTitle
| |
dbp:judges
|
- Denham C.J., [Murray J., Hardiman J.,Clarke J., [Dunne J.]| number of judges = 5] (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- dbr:Immigration
- (en)
- 1996.0
- Economic considerations (en)
- Family Reunification (en)
- Judicial Review Proceedings (en)
- Proportionality of discretion (en)
- Refugee Status (en)
|
dbp:name
|
- Ams v Minister for Justice and Equality (en)
|
dbp:opinions
|
- It was held that Section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996 allows the Minister for Justice and Equality to asses the financial burden that a refugees qualified dependants will put on the State, in regard to the application for their entry. (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Ams v Minister for Justice and Equality, [2015] 1 ILRM 170; [2014] IESC 65, was a Irish Supreme Court case where the Court held that Section 18 (4) of allowed the Minister of Justice to assess the potential financial strain that a refugee's dependents would place on the State while deciding on an application for entry. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- AMS v Minister for Justice and Equality (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |