About: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974), is an administrative law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that extensive state regulation of a public utility does not transform its acts into state action that is reviewable by a federal court under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/483/754/155853/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/348/954/2010936/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109125/jackson-v-metropolitan-edison-co/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/419/345.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17665151143207312572 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/419/345/case.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-5845 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep419/usrep419345/usrep419345.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	32318055 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	10193 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1070249160 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Public_Utilities_Commission_of_the_District_of_Columbia_v._Pollak dbr:Electric_power_industry dbr:Electricity_meter dbr:F.2d dbr:Minor_(law) dbc:1975_in_United_States_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_419 dbr:Pennsylvania dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Middle_District_of_Pennsylvania dbr:United_States_administrative_law dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:State_actor dbr:Pennsylvania_Public_Utility_Commission dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Monopoly dbc:United_States_energy_case_law dbr:Common_law dbr:Tariff_(disambiguation) dbc:York,_Pennsylvania dbc:FirstEnergy dbr:Burton_v._Wilmington_Parking_Authority dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:District_of_Columbia_Public_Service_Commission dbr:3d_Cir. dbr:FirstEnergy dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Metropolitan_Edison_Co._v._People_Against_Nuclear_Energy dbr:Racial_segregation dbr:Certiorari dbr:York,_Pennsylvania dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:Public_utility dbr:Plaintiff dbr:M.D._Pa. dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 dbr:F._Supp. dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-10-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1974 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109125/jackson-v-metropolitan-edison-co/
dbp:decidedate	0001-12-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1974 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Douglas (en) Brennan (en) Marshall (en)
dbp:docket	73 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/419/345.html
dbp:fullname	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17665151143207312572
dbp:holding	The termination of service to a customer by a regulated public utility does not constitute state action and is thus not subject to judicial review under the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/419/345/case.html
dbp:lawsapplied	U.S. Const. amend. XIV; (en)
dbp:litigants	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep419/usrep419345/usrep419345.pdf
dbp:majority	Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/73-5845
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	17280.0
dbp:uspage	345 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	419 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Reflist dbt:USC dbt:Ussc dbt:US14thAmendment
dcterms:subject	dbc:1975_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_energy_case_law dbc:York,_Pennsylvania dbc:FirstEnergy dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974), is an administrative law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that extensive state regulation of a public utility does not transform its acts into state action that is reviewable by a federal court under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
rdfs:label	Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. yago-res:Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. wikidata:Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4o4Aq
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Jackson_v._Metropolitan_Edison_Co.?oldid=1070249160&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Jackson_v._Metropolitan_Edison_Co.
foaf:name	(en) Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Jackson_v_Metropolitan_Edison_Co. dbr:419_U.S._345
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Public_Utilities_Commission_of_the_District_of_Columbia_v._Pollak dbr:Jackson_v_Metropolitan_Edison_Co. dbr:Communications_Workers_of_America_v._Beck dbr:419_U.S._345 dbr:Flood_v._Kuhn dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Pacific_Gas_&_Electric_Co._v._State_En...Conservation_&_Development_Commission dbr:Public_service_law_in_the_United_States dbr:Metropolitan_Edison_Co._v._People_Against_Nuclear_Energy
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Jackson_v._Metropolitan_Edison_Co.