This HTML5 document contains 59 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n12https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Provincial_Court_Judges'_Assn_of_New_Brunswick_v_New_Brunswick_(Minister_of_Justice)
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Minister of Justice)
rdfs:comment
Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Minister of Justice); Ontario Judges Assn v Ontario (Management Board); Bodner v Alberta; Conférence des juges du Québec v Quebec (AG); Minc v Quebec (AG) [2005] 2 S.C.R. 286 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in which the Court attempted to resolve questions about judicial independence left over from the landmark Provincial Judges Reference (1997). The Court found that government remuneration of provincial court judges that is lower than what an independent salary commission recommended can be justified. A broader perspective should be taken whether overall conditions of judicial independence have been met and some deference to the government is needed.
dcterms:subject
dbc:2005_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Canadian_constitutional_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
6252971
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
644141695
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Therrien_(Re) dbr:Constitution_Act,_1867 dbr:Valente_v._The_Queen dbc:2005_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:R._v._Généreux dbc:Canadian_constitutional_case_law dbr:Alberta_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Anonymous_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Preamble dbr:Provincial_Judges_Reference dbr:Anti-Inflation_Reference dbr:Mackeigan_v._Hickman dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(McLachlin_Court) dbr:Quebec dbr:Judicial_independence dbr:Deference dbr:Good_faith dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_New_Brunswick dbr:Judicial_Compensation_and_Benefits_Commission dbr:Government_of_Alberta dbr:Alberta dbr:Beauregard_v._Canada dbr:Ontario dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:New_Brunswick
owl:sameAs
n12:4tRvb wikidata:Q7252626 freebase:m.012m29mw
dbp:unanimous
dbr:Anonymous_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Lexum-scc dbt:Italic_title dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Reflist
dbp:docket
30477 30006 30148 29525
dbp:citations
[2005] 2 S.C.R. 286; 2005 SCC 44 ; , 288 N.B.R. 202; , 255 D.L.R. 513; , 30 Admin. L.R. 1; , 201 O.A.C. 293
dbp:history
Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for New Brunswick.
dbp:ratio
The reasons given by the governments of Alberta, Ontario and New Brunswick for not following judicial remuneration recommendations were rational.
dbo:abstract
Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Minister of Justice); Ontario Judges Assn v Ontario (Management Board); Bodner v Alberta; Conférence des juges du Québec v Quebec (AG); Minc v Quebec (AG) [2005] 2 S.C.R. 286 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in which the Court attempted to resolve questions about judicial independence left over from the landmark Provincial Judges Reference (1997). The Court found that government remuneration of provincial court judges that is lower than what an independent salary commission recommended can be justified. A broader perspective should be taken whether overall conditions of judicial independence have been met and some deference to the government is needed.
dbp:caseName
Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick
dbp:decidedDate
0001-07-22
dbp:fullCaseName
Provincial Court Judges’ Association of New Brunswick, Honourable Judge Michael McKee and Honourable Judge Steven Hutchinson v Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick, as represented by the Minister of Justice
dbp:heardDate
0001-11-09
dbp:scc
2004
gold:hypernym
dbr:Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Provincial_Court_Judges'_Assn_of_New_Brunswick_v_New_Brunswick_(Minister_of_Justice)?oldid=644141695&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7054
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Provincial_Court_Judges'_Assn_of_New_Brunswick_v_New_Brunswick_(Minister_of_Justice)