dbo:abstract
|
- Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest was a case heard at the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 2000 and set new case law with regard to the use of wheel clamps by establishing a legal precedent in relation to the concept of consent by expanding upon the decision in the case of Arthur & Another v Anker & Another [1996] 3 AER 783. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 7694 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:citations
|
- [2000] 1 WLR 2383, (en)
- [2000] 4 All ER 169, (en)
- [2000] EWCA Civ 106, [2000] BLGR 481, (en)
- [2000] RTR 270 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:judges
|
- Roch LJ, Waller LJ and May LJ (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- Tort - Wrongful interference with goods - Cause of action - Parking on private property without authority - Immobilising a vehicle - Consent - Volenti non fit injuria. (en)
|
dbp:name
|
- Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest (en)
|
dbp:priorActions
|
- Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest, London County Court (en)
|
dbp:transcripts
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest was a case heard at the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 2000 and set new case law with regard to the use of wheel clamps by establishing a legal precedent in relation to the concept of consent by expanding upon the decision in the case of Arthur & Another v Anker & Another [1996] 3 AER 783. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |