An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Adler v Ontario (AG), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 609 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the nature of the provincial education power and whether there was a constitutional obligation to fund private denominational education. The Court found that Ontario's Education Act did not violate sections 2(a) or 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Adler v Ontario (AG), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 609 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the nature of the provincial education power and whether there was a constitutional obligation to fund private denominational education. The Court found that Ontario's Education Act did not violate sections 2(a) or 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5410824 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8619 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1091724180 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Adler v Ontario (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1996] 3 S.C.R. 609 (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Sopinka J. (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • McLachlin J. (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1996-11-21 (xsd:date)
dbp:dissent
  • L'Heureux‑Dubé J. (en)
dbp:docket
  • 24347 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Susie Adler, Mark Grossman, Paula Kezwer, Marcy Rapp and Riky Young v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Ontario, the Minister of Education and the Minister of Health; Leo Elgersma, Harry Pott, Raymond Dostal, Harry Fernhout and the Ontario Alliance of Christian Schools Societies v. The Attorney General for Ontario, the Minister of Education and the Minister of Health (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 0001-01-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:history
  • Judgment for the Attorney General of Ontario, Minister of Education for Ontario, and Minister of Health for Ontario in the Court of Appeal for Ontario. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Major J. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Lamer C.J. and La Forest, Gonthier and Cory JJ. (en)
dbp:lawapplied
  • Reference Re Bill 30, An Act to amend the Education Act (Ont.), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1148 (en)
dbp:majority
  • Iacobucci J. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Government funding of Catholic schools but not of other religious schools does not infringe the constitution. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1992 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Adler v Ontario (AG), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 609 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the nature of the provincial education power and whether there was a constitutional obligation to fund private denominational education. The Court found that Ontario's Education Act did not violate sections 2(a) or 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Adler v Ontario (AG) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License