United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It concerned a pacifist applicant for naturalization who in the interview declared not to be willing to "take up arms personally" in defense of the United States. Originally found unable by the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to take the prescribed oath of allegiance, a decision reversed in appeal, the case was argued before the Supreme Court, which ruled against the applicant, and thus denied her the possibility of becoming a United States citizen.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - United States v. Schwimmer (en)
- 美国诉施维默案 (zh)
|
rdfs:comment
| - United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It concerned a pacifist applicant for naturalization who in the interview declared not to be willing to "take up arms personally" in defense of the United States. Originally found unable by the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to take the prescribed oath of allegiance, a decision reversed in appeal, the case was argued before the Supreme Court, which ruled against the applicant, and thus denied her the possibility of becoming a United States citizen. (en)
- 美國訴施維默案(United States v. Schwimmer),279 U.S. 644 (1929),是由美國最高法院裁決的一個案件,關係到一位申請歸化的和平主義者,在面試中她表明不願意為了保衛美國而「親自拿起武器」。原本伊利諾州北區地方法院判決是無法執行指定的,但在隨後的上訴中被推翻,本案最終上訴到最高法院,最高法院判申請人敗訴,而因此否定了她成為一名美國公民的可能性。 (zh)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- United States v.Rosika Schwimmer (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Stone (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - Naturalization Act of 1906 (en)
|
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - United States v. Schwimmer, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - United States v. Rosika Schwimmer (en)
|
Holding
| - Pacifists are liable to be incapable of the attachment for and devotion to the principles of the U.S. Constitution that is required of aliens seeking naturalization. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - United States v. Schwimmer (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It concerned a pacifist applicant for naturalization who in the interview declared not to be willing to "take up arms personally" in defense of the United States. Originally found unable by the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to take the prescribed oath of allegiance, a decision reversed in appeal, the case was argued before the Supreme Court, which ruled against the applicant, and thus denied her the possibility of becoming a United States citizen. (en)
- 美國訴施維默案(United States v. Schwimmer),279 U.S. 644 (1929),是由美國最高法院裁決的一個案件,關係到一位申請歸化的和平主義者,在面試中她表明不願意為了保衛美國而「親自拿起武器」。原本伊利諾州北區地方法院判決是無法執行指定的,但在隨後的上訴中被推翻,本案最終上訴到最高法院,最高法院判申請人敗訴,而因此否定了她成為一名美國公民的可能性。 (zh)
|
googlescholar
| |
Overruled
| - Girouard v. United States (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |