About: Smith and Grady v United Kingdom

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Smith and Grady v United Kingdom Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

Smith and Grady v UK (1999) 29 EHRR 493 was a notable decision of the European Court of Human Rights that unanimously found that the investigation into and subsequent discharge of personnel from the Royal Navy on the basis they were homosexual was a breach of their right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision, which caused widespread controversy at the time led the UK to adopt a revised sexual-orientation-free Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct in January 2000. In UK law the decision is notable because the applicants' case had previously been dismissed in both the High Court and Court of Appeal, who had found that the authorities' actions had not violated the principles of legality including Wednesbury unreasonableness, thus highlighting

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (en)
rdfs:comment	Smith and Grady v UK (1999) 29 EHRR 493 was a notable decision of the European Court of Human Rights that unanimously found that the investigation into and subsequent discharge of personnel from the Royal Navy on the basis they were homosexual was a breach of their right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision, which caused widespread controversy at the time led the UK to adopt a revised sexual-orientation-free Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct in January 2000. In UK law the decision is notable because the applicants' case had previously been dismissed in both the High Court and Court of Appeal, who had found that the authorities' actions had not violated the principles of legality including Wednesbury unreasonableness, thus highlighting (en)
name	Smith and Grady v UK (en)
dct:subject	1999 in LGBT history History of the Royal Navy Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights cases involving the United Kingdom 1999 in case law United Kingdom LGBT rights case law Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1999 in British law
Wikipage page ID	25586988 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1114878079 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Royal Navy 1999 in LGBT history History of the Royal Navy Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom) Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights cases involving the United Kingdom 1999 in case law European Court of Human Rights United Kingdom LGBT rights case law Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1999 in British law Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights Obiter dicta Necessary in a democratic society European Convention on Human Rights Richard Dannatt Wednesbury unreasonableness dbr:British_Defence_Liaison_Service
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp%3Faction=html&documentId=696285&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
sameAs	Smith and Grady v United Kingdom Smith and Grady v United Kingdom Smith and Grady v United Kingdom
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:LGBT_UK_sidebar dbt:Infobox_court_case
citations	29 (xsd:integer)
court	European Court of Human Rights
keywords	Right to A Private Life, Homosexuality in the Military (en)
has abstract	Smith and Grady v UK (1999) 29 EHRR 493 was a notable decision of the European Court of Human Rights that unanimously found that the investigation into and subsequent discharge of personnel from the Royal Navy on the basis they were homosexual was a breach of their right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision, which caused widespread controversy at the time led the UK to adopt a revised sexual-orientation-free Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct in January 2000. In UK law the decision is notable because the applicants' case had previously been dismissed in both the High Court and Court of Appeal, who had found that the authorities' actions had not violated the principles of legality including Wednesbury unreasonableness, thus highlighting the difference in approach of the European Court of Human Rights and the domestic courts. (en)
date decided	1999-09-27 (xsd:date)
prior actions	R v Ministry of Defence, ex p Smith [1996] (en)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Smith_and_Grady_v_United_Kingdom?oldid=1114878079&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9909 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Smith_and_Grady_v_United_Kingdom
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	United Kingdom labour law Dudgeon v United Kingdom List of LGBT-related cases before international courts and quasi-judicial bodies Alekseyev v. Russia Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights Huang v Home Secretary Smith and Grady v. United Kingdom Smith and Grady v UK
is Wikipage redirect of	Smith and Grady v. United Kingdom Smith and Grady v UK
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Smith_and_Grady_v_United_Kingdom

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software