Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that, where a capital defendant's future dangerousness is at issue, and the only alternative sentence available is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the sentencing jury must be informed that the defendant is ineligible for parole. Although Simmons was a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed its holding.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Simmons v. South Carolina (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that, where a capital defendant's future dangerousness is at issue, and the only alternative sentence available is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the sentencing jury must be informed that the defendant is ineligible for parole. Although Simmons was a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed its holding. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Simmons v. South Carolina (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Simmons v. South Carolina, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Simmons v. South Carolina (en)
|
Holding
| - Where a capital defendant's future dangerousness is at issue, and the only sentencing alternative to death is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, due process entitles the defendant to inform the jury of his future parole ineligibility. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Simmons v. South Carolina (en)
|
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that, where a capital defendant's future dangerousness is at issue, and the only alternative sentence available is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the sentencing jury must be informed that the defendant is ineligible for parole. After being found guilty of murder, Jonathan Dale Simmons faced either execution or life in prison without parole. The State asked the jury to sentence Mr. Simmons to death, in part because he posed a future danger to society. Although Mr. Simmons repeatedly requested permission to instruct the jury that he would never be released from prison, these requests were denied by the trial court. Denying Mr. Simmons his requested instruction violated his due process rights, the Supreme Court held, and presented to the jury a "false choice between sentencing petitioner to death and sentencing him to a limited period of incarceration." Although Simmons was a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed its holding. (en)
|
Concurrence
| - Souter (en)
- O'Connor (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
|
cornell
| |
JoinConcurrence
| - Stevens (en)
- Rehnquist, Kennedy (en)
|
JoinPlurality
| - Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
|
Plurality
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |