About: R v Blaue     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Blaue

R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is an English criminal law appeal in which the Court of Appeal decided, being a court of binding precedent thus established, that the refusal of a Jehovah's Witness to accept a blood transfusion after being stabbed did not constitute an intervening act for the purposes of legal causation. This upheld the decision of Mocatta J. in the court below.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • R v Blaue (en)
rdfs:comment
  • R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is an English criminal law appeal in which the Court of Appeal decided, being a court of binding precedent thus established, that the refusal of a Jehovah's Witness to accept a blood transfusion after being stabbed did not constitute an intervening act for the purposes of legal causation. This upheld the decision of Mocatta J. in the court below. (en)
name
  • R v Blaue (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dagger.png
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
vlex
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
case
  • R v Blaue 61 Cr App R 271 (en)
citations
  • [1975] 1 WLR 1411; [1975] 3 All ER 446; 61 Cr App R 271; [1975] Crim LR 648; 119 SJ 589 (en)
court
full name
  • Regina v. Robert Konrad Blaue (en)
imagesize
judges
  • Lawton L.J., Thompson J, Shaw J (en)
keywords
  • Novus actus interveniens; causation; blood transfusion; manslaughter on ground of diminished responsibility and wounding; appeal against homicide conviction (en)
has abstract
  • R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is an English criminal law appeal in which the Court of Appeal decided, being a court of binding precedent thus established, that the refusal of a Jehovah's Witness to accept a blood transfusion after being stabbed did not constitute an intervening act for the purposes of legal causation. This upheld the decision of Mocatta J. in the court below. (en)
date decided
opinions
  • Per curiam : manslaughter or murder can remain the appropriate charge notwithstanding that a victim has refused medical treatment, in some circumstances (en)
prior actions
  • Conviction at Teesside Crown Court in October 1974 (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software