dbo:abstract
|
- R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is an English criminal law appeal in which the Court of Appeal decided, being a court of binding precedent thus established, that the refusal of a Jehovah's Witness to accept a blood transfusion after being stabbed did not constitute an intervening act for the purposes of legal causation. This upheld the decision of Mocatta J. in the court below. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4077 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:case
|
- R v Blaue 61 Cr App R 271 (en)
|
dbp:citations
|
- [1975] 1 WLR 1411; [1975] 3 All ER 446; 61 Cr App R 271; [1975] Crim LR 648; 119 SJ 589 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:fullName
|
- Regina v. Robert Konrad Blaue (en)
|
dbp:imagesize
| |
dbp:judges
|
- Lawton L.J., Thompson J, Shaw J (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- Novus actus interveniens; causation; blood transfusion; manslaughter on ground of diminished responsibility and wounding; appeal against homicide conviction (en)
|
dbp:name
| |
dbp:opinions
|
- Per curiam : manslaughter or murder can remain the appropriate charge notwithstanding that a victim has refused medical treatment, in some circumstances (en)
|
dbp:priorActions
|
- Conviction at Teesside Crown Court in October 1974 (en)
|
dbp:vlex
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 is an English criminal law appeal in which the Court of Appeal decided, being a court of binding precedent thus established, that the refusal of a Jehovah's Witness to accept a blood transfusion after being stabbed did not constitute an intervening act for the purposes of legal causation. This upheld the decision of Mocatta J. in the court below. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |