• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Publishers Clearing House     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPrivatelyHeldCompaniesBasedInNewYork, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingcompanyschema:Organizationdul:Agentdul:SocialPersonagentwikidata:Q24229398OrganizationBusiness enterpriseyago:WikicatCompaniesBasedInNassauCounty,NewYorkyago:WikicatCompaniesEstablishedIn1953yago:Abstraction100002137yago:Company108058098yago:Group100031264yago:Institution108053576yago:Organization108008335yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityorganisationyago:SocialGroup107950920yago:WikicatPrivatelyHeldCompaniesBasedInNewYork New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Publishers Clearing House (PCH) is a direct marketing company that markets merchandise and magazine subscriptions with sweepstakes and prize-based games. It was founded in 1953 by Harold Mertz to replace door-to-door magazine subscription sales by a single vendor offering multiple subscriptions by mail. It introduced its sweepstakes in 1967. In the early 1990s, the company was the subject of concerns and legal actions regarding whether consumers were misled about their odds of winning the sweepstakes and whether purchases increased their chances. By 2010, the company had reached settlements with all 50 states.