Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant."
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Mitchell v. Wisconsin (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant." (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Gerald P. Mitchell, Petitioner v. Wisconsin (en)
|
dct:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| - Sotomayor (en)
- Gorsuch (en)
|
docket
| |
JoinDissent
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Gerald P. Mitchell, Petitioner v. Wisconsin (en)
|
Holding
| - "When a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant." (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Mitchell v. Wisconsin (en)
|
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant." (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
JoinPlurality
| - Roberts, Breyer, Kavanaugh (en)
|
Plurality
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |