• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Indian rope trick     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPerformanceHoaxes, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: personyago:WikicatMagicTricksyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Activity100407535yago:Deception100752431yago:Diversion100426928yago:Entertainment100429048yago:Event100029378yago:Falsification100751145yago:Fraud100753685yago:MagicTrick100099951yago:Performance100550771yago:Presentation100521562yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Wrongdoing100732746yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Show100520257yago:Trickery100752954yago:WikicatPerformanceHoaxes New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Indian rope trick is a magic trick said to have been performed in and around India during the 19th century. Sometimes described as "the world’s greatest illusion", it reputedly involved a magician, a length of rope, and one or more boy assistants. In the 1990s the trick was said by some historians to be a hoax perpetrated in 1890 by John Wilkie of the Chicago Tribune newspaper.Peter Lamont has argued that there are no accurate references to the trick predating 1890, and that later stage magic performances of the trick were inspired by Wilkie's account.