About: Exclusionary rule

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Exclusionary rule Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Agent, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FExclusionary_rule

In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law. This may be considered an example of a prophylactic rule formulated by the judiciary in order to protect a constitutional right. The exclusionary rule may also, in some circumstances at least, be considered to follow directly from the constitutional language, such as the Fifth Amendment's command that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" and that no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing agent
rdfs:label	Regla de exclusión (Estados Unidos) (es) Exclusionary rule (en) Aturan pengecualian (in) 위법수집증거배제법칙 (ko) 違法収集証拠排除法則 (ja) 證據排除法則 (zh)
rdfs:comment	違法収集証拠排除法則（いほうしゅうしゅうしょうこはいじょほうそく）とは、証拠の収集手続が違法であったとき、公判手続上の事実認定においてその証拠能力を否定する刑事訴訟上の法理である。略して排除法則とも呼ばれる。 (ja) 위법수집증거배제법칙(違法蒐集證據排除法則)은 적법한 절차에 따르지 아니하고 수집한 증거는 증거로 할 수 없다는 형사소송법과 증거법상 원칙이다. (ko) 證據排除法則（英語：Exclusionary rule）是刑事訴訟的一項證據法理論，目的是判定呈堂的證據是否具有證據能力，藉以斷定得否作裁判的依據。 (zh) In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law. This may be considered an example of a prophylactic rule formulated by the judiciary in order to protect a constitutional right. The exclusionary rule may also, in some circumstances at least, be considered to follow directly from the constitutional language, such as the Fifth Amendment's command that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" and that no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." (en) En el derecho constitucional de los Estados Unidos, regla de exclusión es un principio legal que sostiene que las pruebas recogidas o analizadas, en contra de lo establecido por la Constitución de los Estados Unidos son inadmisibles ante el tribunal en un proceso de índole penal, es decir, no se pueden utilizar en un juicio penal. La Regla de Exclusión se aplica a los ciudadanos estadounienses y a los extranjeros (legales e ilegales) que residen en los Estados Unidos. (es) Aturan pengecualian (bahasa Inggris: exclusionary rule) adalah aturan dalam pengadilan pidana yang menolak menerima bukti yang diambil secara inkonstitusional oleh aparat polisi. Aturan ini dirancang untuk memastikan bahwa polisi tidak melanggar batas konstitusional dalam melakukan penggeledahan, penyitaan, dan interogasi. (in)
dcterms:subject	Searches and seizures Evidence law Privacy law in the United States Legal doctrines and principles
Wikipage page ID	1504970 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1122191017 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Benjamin Cardozo Ronald Reagan English law Boyd v. United States Hudson v. Michigan Replevin United States United States Bill of Rights United States Congress United States constitutional law United States v. Alvarez-Machain United States v. Leon Utah v. Strieff Volstead Act Defendant Due process Police Prophylactic rule Colorado v. Connelly Constitutional right Police misconduct Parallel construction Civil law (common law) Elkins v. United States Grand jury Miranda v. Arizona Miranda warning Consent search Corporate personhood Antonin Scalia Searches and seizures Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States Common law Fruit of the poisonous tree Parole Sugar bowl (legal maxim) Evidence law U.S. state Weeks v. United States William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield Jus tertii Akhil Amar American Revolution Dallin H. Oaks Drug Enforcement Administration Evidence (law) Florida v. Jimeno Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Nix v. Williams Good-faith exception Good faith Legal remedy Legal technicality Prohibition Privacy law in the United States Herring v. United States Iowa Supreme Court Court Legal doctrines and principles Supreme Court of California Supreme Court of the United States Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Mapp v. Ohio Bunning v Cross Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Illinois v. Gates New York Court of Appeals Self-incrimination Wolf v. Colorado Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution Restitution Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Writs of assistance Mistrial (law) Right to counsel Prosecution General warrant NSA warrantless surveillance U.S. Bill of Rights

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software