About: Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Resistance101169317, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDuplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering

Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatBoycotts yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Boycott100206130 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:GroupAction101080366 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Protest101177033 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:Resistance101169317
rdfs:label	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering (en)
rdfs:comment	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of theInternational Association of Machinists, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States labor case law Boycotts International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers 1921 in United States case law United States antitrust case law United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court
Wikipage page ID	20516359 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1078084504 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 254 United States Congress United States Supreme Court International Association of Machinists Machinists v. Street United States Supreme Court cases United States labor case law Louis D. Brandeis Boycotts International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers 1921 in United States case law Loewe v. Lawlor Mahlon Pitney Clayton Antitrust Act United States antitrust case law American Civil War A.L.R. United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court L. Ed. Labor unions New Deal Sherman Antitrust Act Clayton Act Secondary boycott Norris-La Guardia Act
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/254/443.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2440261841066410970 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep254/usrep254443/usrep254443.pdf
sameAs	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Brandeis (en)
JoinDissent	Holmes, Clarke (en)
JoinMajority	White, McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds (en)
LawsApplied	Clayton Act
ParallelCitations	41 (xsd:integer)
USPage	443 (xsd:integer)
USVol	254 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1920 (xsd:integer)
case	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, (en)
DecideDate	0001-01-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1921 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/254/443.html
fullname	Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of the International Association of Machinists, et al. (en)
Holding	The Clayton Act did not insulate labor unions engaged in illegal activities. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/
Litigants	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering (en)
majority	Pitney (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep254/usrep254443/usrep254443.pdf
has abstract	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2440261841066410970
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering?oldid=1078084504&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	4762 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	American Federation of Labor List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 254 Lochner era 254 U.S. 443 History of competition law History of labor law in the United States International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software