About: Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/254/443.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2440261841066410970 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep254/usrep254443/usrep254443.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	20516359 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4762 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1078084504 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_254 dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:International_Association_of_Machinists dbr:Machinists_v._Street dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbr:Louis_D._Brandeis dbc:Boycotts dbc:International_Association_of_Machinists_and_Aerospace_Workers dbc:1921_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Loewe_v._Lawlor dbr:Mahlon_Pitney dbr:Clayton_Antitrust_Act dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbr:American_Civil_War dbr:A.L.R. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Labor_unions dbr:New_Deal dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act dbr:Clayton_Act dbr:Secondary_boycott dbr:Norris-La_Guardia_Act
dbp:arguedate	0001-01-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1920 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-01-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1921 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Brandeis (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/254/443.html
dbp:fullname	Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of the International Association of Machinists, et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2440261841066410970
dbp:holding	The Clayton Act did not insulate labor unions engaged in illegal activities. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Holmes, Clarke (en)
dbp:joinmajority	White, McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/254/443/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Clayton_Act
dbp:litigants	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep254/usrep254443/usrep254443.pdf
dbp:majority	Pitney (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	41 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage	443 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	254 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:Boycotts dbc:International_Association_of_Machinists_and_Aerospace_Workers dbc:1921_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatBoycotts yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Boycott100206130 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:GroupAction101080366 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Protest101177033 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Resistance101169317
rdfs:comment	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade. (en)
rdfs:label	Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering yago-res:Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering wikidata:Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4ii9e
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering?oldid=1078084504&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering
foaf:name	(en) Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of theInternational Association of Machinists, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:254_U.S._443 dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v_Deering dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co_v_Deering dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Company_v._Deering dbr:Duplex_v._Deering dbr:Duplex_vs._Deering
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:American_Federation_of_Labor dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_254 dbr:Lochner_era dbr:254_U.S._443 dbr:History_of_competition_law dbr:History_of_labor_law_in_the_United_States dbr:International_Ass'n_of_Machinists_v._Street dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v_Deering dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co_v_Deering dbr:Duplex_Printing_Press_Company_v._Deering dbr:Duplex_v._Deering dbr:Duplex_vs._Deering
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering