About: Connecticut v. Doehr

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Connecticut v. Doehr Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FConnecticut_v._Doehr

Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
rdfs:comment	Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases 1991 in Connecticut Legal history of Connecticut 1991 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
Wikipage page ID	14521398 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	993661897 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Byron R. White List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 501 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States District Court for the District of Connecticut United States Supreme Court Due Process Clause Due process United States Supreme Court cases Connecticut Mathews v. Eldridge 1991 in Connecticut Legal history of Connecticut Connecticut Superior Court Antonin Scalia 1991 in United States case law Battery (tort) Plurality opinion William H. Rehnquist Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Real property United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Harry Blackmun Attachment (law) L. Ed. 2d Title (property) Certiorari Ex parte Surety bond U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/1.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6737687845557823257 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/1/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112615/connecticut-v-doehr/
sameAs	Connecticut v. Doehr Connecticut v. Doehr Connecticut v. Doehr Connecticut v. Doehr
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc dbt:Ct_law
JoinMajority	unanimous ; Rehnquist, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
LawsApplied	Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (en)
USPage	1 (xsd:integer)
USVol	501 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1991 (xsd:integer)
case	Connecticut v. Doehr, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112615/connecticut-v-doehr/
DecideDate	0001-06-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1991 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/1.html
fullname	Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
Holding	A state law authorizing the prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property at the outset of a lawsuit, without notice to the defendant or a hearing and without any showing of extraordinary circumstances, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/1/case.html
Litigants	Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
majority	White (en)
has abstract	Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
Concurrence	Rehnquist (en) Scalia (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6737687845557823257
JoinConcurrence	Blackmun (en)
JoinPlurality	Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor (en)
Plurality	White (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_v._Doehr?oldid=993661897&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8016 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_v._Doehr
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court 501 U.S. 1 Attachment (law) Connecticut v Doehr

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software